recording of high frequency oscillatory activity
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:09 am
hi,
i'm trying to get my dept to aquire a biosemi system. i did my phd in leipzig on high frequency oscillatory activity in visual object representation. I used a biosemi system and was delighted by the signal-to-noise ratio which gave me excellent data.
however, a lecturer who is considered to be an eeg expert in my dept says that 'Biosemi does not provide the standard EEG that would be acceptable for clinical purposes. Active electrodes are known to enhance the high-frequency oscillatory components but no one knows whether this enhancement is neurophysiologically plausible.'
I thought biosemi can be used for clinical research, but not for diagnostics. however, the 2nd argument completely baffles me. Why would the signal not be neurophysiologically plausible?
thanks in advance for your reply,
Jasna
i'm trying to get my dept to aquire a biosemi system. i did my phd in leipzig on high frequency oscillatory activity in visual object representation. I used a biosemi system and was delighted by the signal-to-noise ratio which gave me excellent data.
however, a lecturer who is considered to be an eeg expert in my dept says that 'Biosemi does not provide the standard EEG that would be acceptable for clinical purposes. Active electrodes are known to enhance the high-frequency oscillatory components but no one knows whether this enhancement is neurophysiologically plausible.'
I thought biosemi can be used for clinical research, but not for diagnostics. however, the 2nd argument completely baffles me. Why would the signal not be neurophysiologically plausible?
thanks in advance for your reply,
Jasna